<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WizOne Solutions &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wizonesolutions.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wizonesolutions.com</link>
	<description>Put some magic into your Web site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:31:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Joomla!</title>
		<link>http://www.wizonesolutions.com/2009/08/07/joomla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wizonesolutions.com/2009/08/07/joomla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WizOne Solutions</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wizonesolutions.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been playing around with Joomla! lately, and it seems to have its pros and cons. Compared to Drupal, it seems a little unnecessarily complex at times, and I don&#8217;t really understand the naming conventions for its extensions (&#8220;modules,&#8221; at least &#8211; blocks, the Drupal equivalent, is a much clearer term).
The administration interface is worth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing around with Joomla! lately, and it seems to have its pros and cons. Compared to Drupal, it seems a little unnecessarily complex at times, and I don&#8217;t really understand the naming conventions for its extensions (&#8220;modules,&#8221; at least &#8211; blocks, the Drupal equivalent, is a much clearer term).</p>
<p>The administration interface is worth applause, though&#8230;Drupal&#8217;s is simpler, although it can be souped up with modules. It seems like Joomla! has more out-of-the-box but that Drupal is easier to get going with and to tailor to one&#8217;s needs. I prefer the latter, since it gives more flexibility to the creation and presentation of content.</p>
<p>Drupal&#8217;s also got much nicer URLs, and turning on its &#8220;Clean URLs&#8221; is super-easy.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m still on the Drupal side, but if you think I should reconsider or try to get more into Joomla!, let me know in the comments.</p>
<p>At some point, I&#8217;ll do a proper comparison between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wizonesolutions.com/2009/08/07/joomla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
